Which analysis measure assesses the economic efficiency of disparate health education programs?

The appropriate measure for assessing the economic efficiency of disparate health education programs is cost-effectiveness analysis. This analysis evaluates the relative costs and outcomes (effects) of two or more courses of action, allowing for a comparison of the efficiency of different programs in achieving specific health outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness analysis is particularly beneficial because it provides a straightforward way to determine which option produces the best outcome for the least amount of resources. It allows health educators and policymakers to prioritize programs based on their outcome efficacy relative to costs.

On the other hand, cost-benefit analysis quantifies the benefits and costs of a program in monetary terms, analyzing whether the benefits of a program exceed its costs. It is more comprehensive than cost-effectiveness analysis, sometimes applying to very different types of programs or initiatives beyond healthcare or health education specifically. Therefore, in examining health education programs, the more targeted measure is the cost-effectiveness analysis, as it directly assesses economic efficiency in achieving health education goals.